Avoiding an Insurance Increase After an Accident

The question people ask after a crash is whether their premium will rise. The more useful question is what an insurer is actually pricing when it looks at that accident, because several of the inputs are still open on the day it happens and in the weeks that follow.

This explainer covers what carriers reprice and why, how the decision to claim is arithmetic rather than instinct, where the rules that apply to you are actually written down, and what to do when the renewal notice arrives. TortWise is a plain-English publisher rather than an insurer, a broker or a law firm. Nothing below is a prediction about your policy, and every figure in it is an illustration used to show the shape of a decision.

What insurers are actually rating

An accident on your record is not a single fact. It is several, and they carry very different weight.

Fault. The dominant input. An at-fault collision is rated differently from one where another driver’s insurer paid, and a number of states restrict insurers from surcharging accidents where the policyholder bore no fault.

Payout size. A claim that cost the insurer a large amount is a stronger signal than one that cost little, which is why severity tends to matter as much as the fact of a claim.

Claim history. A first incident on a long clean record sits differently from a third in a short period. Some carriers weigh frequency heavily even where individual claims were not the policyholder’s fault.

Claim type. Collision, comprehensive and glass are commonly rated differently, with comprehensive generally treated more leniently because the causes sit largely outside a driver’s control.

State rules. Regulation limits what insurers may surcharge for and for how long, and it varies substantially from one state to the next.

Notice what is not on that list: how sorry you were, how minor it looked, or how unfair the whole thing feels. Rating is a pricing exercise carried out on recorded facts, which is exactly why the recorded facts are where your effort belongs.

Why a claim changes the price at all

It helps to understand the mechanism, because it explains which parts of the outcome you can influence and which you cannot.

An insurance premium is a price attached to a probability. The insurer is not charging you for what has happened; it is charging you for what it estimates might happen over the coming policy period, spread across everyone it classifies alongside you. When new information arrives that changes its estimate, the price changes with it. That is repricing rather than punishment, and the distinction is not merely semantic. It is why arguing that you have learned your lesson tends to move nobody, while correcting a wrongly recorded fault determination can move a great deal.

A prior at-fault claim is one of the variables insurers treat as predictive, which is why it carries weight. A claim where someone else’s insurer paid says something different about future cost, which is why it is generally weighted differently or, in some states, not permitted to count at all.

Two consequences follow. First, the size of the payout matters because it is part of the information, not just the fact that a file was opened. Second, because rating is done by class rather than by person, two drivers with the same crash and the same record can land in different classes at different carriers and receive genuinely different answers. Neither answer is wrong. They come from different models.

The arithmetic that decides whether to claim

The common mistake is comparing a repair bill against a deductible and stopping there. The comparison that matters includes the repricing across its whole life.

Work an illustration. Say your annual premium is $1,680, and your insurer tells you that an at-fault property damage claim would reprice your policy by roughly a quarter for four renewals. That is about $420 a year, or $1,680 across the period. Now put a repair against it. A $2,600 estimate on a $1,000 deductible recovers $1,600. On those figures the claim recovers less than it costs.

Change the repair to $9,000 and the same repricing is obviously worth absorbing, because the recovery is $8,000 against the same $1,680.

The threshold is not a fixed dollar figure. It is a relationship: claim when the recovery clearly exceeds the deductible plus the total repricing, and think hard when it does not. The companion calculator on this page runs that comparison on your own numbers rather than the illustrative ones.

Both figures in that illustration have to come from somewhere real. The repair estimate comes from a body shop in writing. The repricing figure comes from your insurer, in writing where possible. Neither comes from an article, including this one.

Two further things people get wrong here. They compare against a single year of increase rather than the full period. And they run the calculation at all in situations where it does not apply, because a claim paid by another driver’s insurer is a different animal from a claim on your own collision coverage.

Where the surcharge rules actually live

This is the section most articles on the topic skip, and it is the one that answers your question properly. Four documents govern what happens to your premium, and none of them is a blog post.

Your policy documents. The declarations page lists your coverages, deductibles, drivers and any endorsements you hold, including a forgiveness endorsement if you have one. The policy form itself sets out your duties after a loss, which is where the requirement to report an accident lives. If you want to know whether you must report something, that is the text that decides it.

Your insurer’s rating plan. Insurers file their rating rules with the state, and those filings are where surcharge structures and the periods they apply for are actually defined. This is the reason no honest article can print the number: it is specific to one carrier in one state at one point in time, and it changes when the carrier files a change.

State statute and regulation. State law can prohibit surcharging in defined circumstances, limit how long an incident may be considered, and set rules for specific claim types. Your state department of insurance is the authority on this, and most publish plain consumer guidance alongside the technical material.

Your claim history report. The industry-wide record of what has been reported about you, which carriers consult when quoting. It is the input everything else runs on, which is why an error in it is expensive.

The practical version: read your declarations page, ask your carrier in writing, and check your state department of insurance for the rules that bind carriers where you live. Those three steps replace every confident number you will find online, including any you might otherwise have taken from here.

Protecting the fault determination

If the accident was not your fault, this is where nearly all your leverage sits, and most of it is spent before you leave the scene.

Photograph before anything moves, where it is safe to do so. Final vehicle positions, damage on both cars, road markings, signals, skid marks, weather and lighting.

Get an incident or police report number. An independent record is the single most persuasive item in a disputed determination.

Collect witness details. The most under-collected and most decisive evidence there is. A neutral third party resolves conflicting accounts faster than anything else available.

Understand what statements at the scene do. Fault is a determination reached on evidence, not on courtesy. An offhand remark can be recorded, repeated and weighed later, which is worth knowing before you speak rather than after.

Write down your own account the same day, while it is exact. Memory for sequence and distance degrades quickly, and a contemporaneous note is a genuine asset if the account is questioned months later.

Our explainers on what to do after a car accident and filing a car accident claim cover the sequence in detail, and the note on getting a police report covers the document itself.

Reporting is not the same as claiming

This distinction saves people from an avoidable and serious problem.

Most policies contain a duty to report an accident within a reasonable time, and that duty generally exists whether or not you intend to make a claim, because the insurer may face a claim from the other party regardless of what you do. Many policies pair it with a duty to cooperate: to provide information, to forward any legal papers you receive, and not to settle anything on the insurer’s behalf.

Failing to report and then discovering later that the other driver has claimed for an injury is considerably worse than reporting a minor incident you then handle privately. It can breach the policy at exactly the moment the policy is what you need, and it removes your insurer’s ability to investigate while the evidence is fresh and to defend you.

Notification is not the same as a paid claim in how carriers treat it, though practices differ enough that it is a fair question to put to yours directly. What is not open to interpretation is your policy text. If it requires prompt notice, it requires prompt notice.

The workable sequence for a genuinely minor incident is to report as the policy requires, then decide separately whether to pursue a claim once written estimates are in hand.

Paying privately, and what it does not remove

Where the arithmetic favours settling a repair yourself, several conditions decide whether that is a reasonable route or a risk you have not priced.

Nobody is injured, and that holds up over the following days rather than only at the roadside. Soft tissue symptoms commonly appear a day or two later, which is the central risk in any private arrangement.

Damage is genuinely minor and confined to visible panels rather than anything structural. Hidden damage found once a bumper comes off can multiply an estimate.

The other party agrees in writing. A short signed note recording the agreement, the amount, and that it settles the property damage is worth having, though it does not bind a later injury claim.

You still report the accident to your insurer exactly as the policy requires. Paying for a repair yourself is a decision about a claim, never a decision to stay silent.

You get a written estimate first rather than agreeing a figure at the roadside, since roadside guesses are almost always low.

Where any of those fails, particularly the injury one, claiming is the safer route despite the repricing. Our note on rental cover after a not-at-fault accident covers the parallel decision on the vehicle side, and diminished value claims cover the loss that a repair invoice does not capture.

Accident forgiveness, read properly

Accident forgiveness sounds simple and varies considerably in what it actually delivers.

At its core it is a product feature: the insurer agrees that a qualifying first at-fault accident will not trigger the repricing its rating plan would otherwise apply. Everything interesting is in the word qualifying.

The questions that determine whether it is worth anything to you: does it apply to a first at-fault accident only, does it apply per policy or per driver, is there a qualifying period before it activates, does it survive a move to another carrier, and what does it cost each year against the repricing it would prevent.

That last comparison is the whole decision, and both halves of it have to come from your insurer rather than from an article. Ask what the endorsement costs annually and what an at-fault property damage claim would otherwise do to your premium and for how long. With those two figures the answer is usually obvious in a minute.

What forgiveness does not do is remove the accident from your record. The incident remains visible in claim history reporting and to any carrier you approach later, which is the most common misunderstanding about it. Forgiveness is an agreement about your price with one insurer, not an eraser.

Where forgiveness shows up, by carrier type

Because the feature is sold rather than mandated, it appears in the market in a handful of recognisable shapes. Knowing the shapes tells you where to look on your own paperwork, not what you will find there.

Bundled into a coverage tier. Some carriers package forgiveness with several other features into an enhanced or premier version of the same policy. The cost is embedded in the tier rather than itemised, so the comparison is against the whole tier.

Earned through tenure. Some grant it after a period of claim-free driving with that carrier specifically. Time with a previous insurer commonly does not count, which is one reason switching has a cost that a quote does not show.

Sold as a named endorsement. Some list it as its own form on the declarations page with its own premium line. This is the easiest version to evaluate, because the price is visible.

Not offered at all. A legitimate position, and common among carriers competing hardest on base price. Its absence is not a defect.

Distribution changes who you ask rather than what exists. With an agent-distributed carrier, the agent can usually read the filing language back to you. With a direct carrier, it tends to appear as an option in the quote flow and in the policy documents. A regional insurer may offer a narrower endorsement menu in the one or two states it writes in.

Whichever shape applies, verify it the same way: find the endorsement by name or form number on your declarations page, then ask which drivers it covers, whether it is per policy or per driver, what counts as a qualifying accident, and what happens to it if you move. A feature you cannot find on the declarations page is a feature you should not be counting on.

What happens at renewal, and what to do about it

Any effect usually appears at the first renewal after the claim closes rather than immediately, which is why people are sometimes surprised months later by something they thought had been resolved.

Three things are worth doing when that renewal notice arrives.

Ask for the reason in writing. Insurers can generally explain what drove an increase, and occasionally the answer reveals an error, such as an accident recorded as at-fault when the determination was otherwise. A written answer is also what you compare against later if the number moves again.

Check your claim history report. Industry databases record claims, and errors happen. A misrecorded fault determination is correctable, and it is worth checking rather than assuming the record is right.

Shop the market properly. This is the step with the most upside, and it is covered next.

One more thing worth separating out: general rate movement. Premiums rise across whole markets for reasons that have nothing to do with you, and it is easy to attribute a broad increase to your own accident. Asking for the reason in writing is what tells the two apart.

Why shopping works even with an accident on record

Switching does not hide the accident. Claim history follows you, and any new carrier will check it before quoting.

What varies enormously is how much weight different carriers place on the same history. Insurers use different rating models and target different customer profiles, so a driver who looks expensive to one can look ordinary to another. That variation, rather than any tactic, is why shopping after an accident frequently produces a better outcome than accepting a renewal.

Three practical points travel with it. Do not let coverage lapse while shopping, because a gap is penalised in its own right and can cost more than the accident did. Compare identical limits and deductibles rather than premium alone, since a cheaper quote with lower liability limits is a smaller promise rather than a better deal. And check whether a discount you currently hold, such as multi-policy or long tenure, would be lost by moving.

The habit worth building regardless of accidents is shopping at every renewal rather than only after something goes wrong.

Reducing the premium in ways unrelated to the accident

If a repricing is unavoidable, the other levers still work, and they are worth pulling in the same year rather than later.

Raise the deductible, if you could comfortably pay the higher amount tomorrow. This lowers premium directly and is the most reliable single change available.

Bundle policies where the combined price genuinely beats two separate ones, which is worth checking rather than assuming.

Claim every discount you qualify for. Defensive driving courses, low annual mileage, safety features, occupational and affiliation discounts, and paperless or paid-in-full arrangements are commonly available and commonly unclaimed.

Review coverage on an older vehicle. Collision and comprehensive on a car worth little may cost more over a few years than they could ever pay out, which is a calculation worth doing on the current value rather than the remembered one.

Consider telematics if your driving pattern supports it, understanding that it can raise a premium as well as lower one.

Recheck your annual mileage. Commuting patterns change, and a figure set years ago may now overstate your exposure.

None of these undoes a repricing. Together they frequently offset a meaningful part of it, and unlike the accident itself they are entirely within your control.

The mistakes that make it worse

Not reporting because you hope it goes away. The most damaging one, because it can breach the policy exactly when you need it most.

Admitting fault at the scene before the facts are established.

Agreeing a private settlement where an injury might be involved, which can leave you exposed when a claim arrives weeks later.

Filing a small claim without doing the arithmetic, then paying more in repricing than the claim ever recovered.

Letting coverage lapse while shopping, which costs more than most people expect.

Assuming a not-at-fault accident cannot affect you, without checking that the determination was recorded correctly.

Reducing liability limits to offset an increase, which trades a manageable cost for an unmanageable exposure.

Accepting the renewal without shopping, which is the most common and most expensive of all.

A worked example

An illustrative case, with invented figures. A driver is rear-ended at a junction. Both cars are drivable, and the damage to hers is estimated at $3,400. She carries a $500 deductible and pays $1,680 a year.

At the scene. She photographs both vehicles in position, the damage, and the junction. She takes the other driver’s details and a photograph of their insurance card, obtains an incident number, and takes contact details from a witness who stopped.

Day 1. She reports to her own insurer, saying plainly that she is reporting rather than claiming while estimates are gathered. She also notifies the other driver’s insurer.

Day 4. The other insurer accepts liability, supported by the incident report and the witness account. Because liability is accepted, the repair goes through their property damage cover rather than her collision cover, so no claim is made on her own policy.

At renewal. Her premium is broadly unchanged. The accident appears on her record as not-at-fault, and her carrier tells her it does not reprice for those.

Now change one variable. Had she not collected the witness details, and had the other driver disputed the account, the determination could have landed as shared fault. In many states that reduces or removes not-at-fault protection, and her own collision coverage would then have been in play: a $3,400 repair on a $500 deductible recovers $2,900, against a repricing she would have had to ask her carrier to quantify. The whole difference traces back to two minutes at the scene. Running both versions through the companion calculator shows how far apart they sit.

How long the effect lasts, and who decides

TortWise does not publish a number here, and the reason is worth stating plainly: the period is defined in each insurer’s rating plan as filed with its state regulator, and some states additionally cap how long an incident may be considered at all. Any single figure would be wrong for most readers, and a wrong figure on this particular question costs real money because it feeds straight into the claim-or-pay decision.

What can be described is the shape, which is consistent enough to be useful. An effect that appears at the first renewal after a claim closes commonly reduces as the incident ages rather than ending in one step. Carriers differ in how quickly that happens, and a carrier that weighs an older incident lightly may still weigh a recent one heavily.

Two practical consequences follow. First, the period right after a claim is when the difference between carriers is widest, which makes it the strongest case for shopping. Second, if you stayed put because switching felt pointless while the accident was fresh, later years are worth revisiting, since your position improves each year and a renewal offer may not reflect that as generously as a new quote would.

There is also a distinction between an accident affecting your rate and an accident being visible. It remains in claim history reporting for a period regardless of whether any particular carrier chooses to reprice for it, which is how an insurer can truthfully say the accident no longer affects your premium while still knowing about it.

So ask two specific questions and get them in writing: how long an at-fault accident affects rates on your policy, and whether the effect tapers or ends at once. Neither is usually volunteered, and both are ordinary questions that carriers answer.

Multi-driver policies and young drivers

Where more than one person is on a policy, the picture gets more complicated in ways worth anticipating before they arrive.

Repricing generally attaches to the policy rather than to one individual, so an at-fault accident by one driver commonly affects the premium the household pays. Some insurers also rate the incident against the specific driver, which matters later if that person leaves the policy. Which of those applies to you is a question for your carrier.

Young and newly licensed drivers already sit in the highest rating classes, and an at-fault accident on top of that tends to produce the largest absolute increases seen anywhere in auto insurance. That sharpens the claim-or-pay arithmetic for a household with a teenage driver, because a repair that clearly warrants a claim on an experienced driver’s record may not on a new driver’s.

Forgiveness frequently does not extend to the newest driver on a policy, which is precisely the person most likely to need it. Worth checking against the endorsement wording rather than assuming.

If a driver leaves the household, ask whether removing them removes the associated repricing, since practices differ and it is not automatic. And where a young driver has an at-fault accident, a defensive driving discount is worth pursuing more than usual, because it is one of the few levers available to someone with no record to fall back on.

When an injury is involved, the calculation changes

Everything above assumes a property damage question. Once anyone is hurt, the framing shifts and several of the considerations stop applying.

A private arrangement stops being viable. A soft tissue injury commonly presents a day or two after a crash, and an agreement made at the roadside does not bind someone who develops symptoms later. Paying privately to avoid a repricing, in a crash where anyone reported feeling shaken, is a risk rather than a saving.

Your liability limits become the exposure that matters. A property damage repricing is measured in hundreds a year. An injury claim exceeding your liability limit is measured in a different order of magnitude, and the excess is your personal responsibility. That is the reason to carry meaningful limits rather than state minimums, and the reason not to cut them to offset an increase.

Reporting stops being optional in any practical sense. Your insurer’s duty to defend you depends on knowing, and knowing early enough to investigate.

The repricing is the smaller problem. An at-fault injury claim will affect your premium, and that is a consequence to accept rather than to manage around.

If you were injured and another driver was at fault, the position reverses and your own premium is largely not the issue. Our explainers on whether you need a lawyer and what a claim is worth cover that side, the note on dealing with an adjuster covers the conversations that follow, and who pays medical bills covers the question that usually comes first.

Checking your claim history for errors

Insurers rate you partly on industry-wide claim reporting, and that record is not always right.

You are generally entitled to request your own report from the reporting agencies, and doing so periodically is reasonable housekeeping rather than paranoia. The errors that matter are specific: an accident recorded as at-fault when the determination was otherwise, a claim listed that you never made, a duplicate entry for a single incident, or a claim attributed to you that belonged to a previous policyholder or a similarly named person.

Any of those can cost money at every renewal and every quote, quietly, for years, because every carrier that looks at you is reading the same record.

If you find an error, the correction process runs through the reporting agency and typically requires supporting documentation. That is another argument for keeping the file from any accident: the incident report, the photographs, the estimates, and the correspondence that established fault.

Do this before shopping rather than after. An error corrected first means every quote you gather is built on the accurate record, which is worth more than any negotiating you could do afterwards.

Shopping the market properly after an accident

Because this is the step with the most upside, it deserves to be done methodically rather than by gathering two quotes and giving up.

Start six to eight weeks before renewal. Rushing produces worse comparisons, and a policy that is not about to lapse gives you room to be selective.

Gather quotes from a spread of carrier types: large national names, a regional insurer if one writes where you live, and at least one direct-only carrier. They weigh records differently, and the spread is where the saving hides.

Give every quote identical inputs. Same liability limits, same deductibles, same coverages, same drivers and vehicles. A cheaper quote reached by quietly lowering limits is not a saving.

Disclose the accident accurately. They will find it, and a quote based on incomplete disclosure is not a real quote. Being precise about a not-at-fault determination is particularly worthwhile.

Ask each carrier how it treats your specific accident. Some will tell you plainly whether it is surcharged, for how long, and whether any forgiveness applies.

Check what you lose by moving, including tenure discounts, bundled savings and any accrued forgiveness.

Never let coverage lapse. Even a short gap is penalised heavily and can undo the whole exercise. Arrange the new policy to start the day the old one ends.

An hour spent on this after an at-fault accident routinely outperforms every other item on this page, precisely because the variation between carriers on the same record is so much wider than most people assume.

Comprehensive, glass and the claims that rarely hurt

Not every claim carries the same risk, and treating them all as equally dangerous leads people to pay privately for things that might have cost them nothing to claim.

Comprehensive claims cover events largely outside a driver’s control: weather, theft, vandalism, fire, falling objects and animal strikes. Insurers generally treat these differently from at-fault collisions because they say little about how someone drives. Our note on hitting a deer and who pays works through one of the common versions.

Glass claims are handled separately again by many carriers, and some states have specific rules about windshield claims. Driving on a cracked windshield to protect a premium that might not have moved is a poor trade, and in some places it is also an inspection failure.

Roadside assistance use is commonly not treated as a claim at all, though frequent use is noticed by some carriers.

The caveat across all three is frequency. A single comprehensive claim rarely matters much; several in a short period can affect a renewal or, in some cases, eligibility, even where none was anyone’s fault.

The reliable approach is to ask rather than assume. Calling to ask how a specific claim type is treated is not itself a claim and does not create a record of one. That single question prevents both mistakes: paying privately for something that would have been harmless, and filing something that quietly costs more than it recovers.

A second worked example, where it goes wrong

The counterpart, because a failure pattern is usually more instructive than a success.

A driver clips a parked car in a car park, leaving a dented door. Nobody is around. The damage looks modest, he leaves a note with his number, and the owner calls that evening. They agree verbally that he will pay for the repair.

Week one. The body shop quotes $2,900, considerably more than the couple of hundred dollars he had pictured, because the door needs replacing rather than filling and the paint has to be blended across two panels.

Week two. He decides to claim after all. His insurer asks when the accident occurred, and the answer is eleven days ago. His policy required prompt notification. The claim is accepted, and the delay is noted.

Week four. The other owner reports neck discomfort and opens an injury claim, having initially said she was fine. Because the incident was reported late, his insurer had no opportunity to investigate at the time, photograph the vehicles, or take a contemporaneous account from either party.

At renewal. The accident is recorded as at-fault with an injury component, and his carrier reprices accordingly.

Three decisions produced that outcome, and all three were avoidable. Agreeing a figure before getting an estimate. Not reporting promptly, which the policy required regardless of any intention to claim. And treating an absence of complaint at the scene as evidence that no injury claim would follow.

Had he reported on day one and then decided about claiming once the estimate arrived, the property damage outcome would have been identical and the injury claim would have been handled from a far stronger position. The lesson is not that he should have hidden less. It is that reporting was never the part he had a choice about.

Questions to ask your insurer

Most of the uncertainty in this explainer can be removed with one phone call, and none of these questions creates a claim.

How long does an at-fault accident affect rates on my policy, and does the effect taper or end at once?

Do you reprice for not-at-fault accidents, and how do you treat an accident where fault is shared?

Do I have accident forgiveness, and if so which drivers does it cover and what counts as a qualifying accident?

What would the endorsement cost me annually if I do not have it?

How are comprehensive and glass claims treated compared with collision?

If I report an accident but do not claim, does that appear on my record or affect my rate?

If I use my own collision cover because the other driver was uninsured, is that treated as at-fault?

What discounts am I currently not receiving that I might qualify for?

Ask for the answers in writing where you can. Beyond settling the immediate decision, a written answer is what you compare against if a later renewal looks higher than the conversation suggested it would.

What you cannot control, and why that matters

It is worth being clear about the limits, because plenty of advice in this area implies more control than anyone has.

You cannot remove a genuine at-fault accident from your record. It is reported industry-wide and any carrier you approach will see it. Advice suggesting otherwise is either describing an error correction or is simply wrong.

You cannot prevent a repricing by switching mid-term. The accident travels with you.

You cannot always control the fault determination. You can make an accurate one easy to reach through evidence, which is a great deal, but where accounts genuinely conflict and no independent evidence exists, shared fault is a possible outcome regardless of what happened.

You cannot control base rate movement. Premiums rise across whole markets for reasons unrelated to you.

You cannot undo a lapse in coverage. It is penalised for a period regardless of the circumstances.

What you can control is narrower and still substantial: the evidence gathered at the scene, whether you report promptly, whether you claim on a marginal loss, whether your record is accurate, and whether you shop. That list is short enough to remember, and it covers most of the difference between two drivers with identical accidents and very different renewals.

The bottom line

Premiums move because of fault and payout size, not simply because something happened. The highest-value work is therefore done at the scene: photographs, an incident number, and witness details that make an accurate determination easy to reach.

Where you are at fault, do the arithmetic before claiming. Compare the recovery against the deductible plus the repricing across its whole life rather than one renewal, and get both figures from a body shop and your insurer rather than from any article. Reporting is required either way.

And whatever the outcome, shop the market at the next renewal. Carriers weigh the same accident very differently, and that variation is usually worth more than any single tactic here.

The framing that helps most is this. An accident is not one event that raises your premium. It is a set of separate decisions spread across the following year: whether it is recorded as at-fault, whether you claim on it, whether the record is accurate, and whether you accept the renewal. Each is decided at a different moment, and the driver who treats them as one inevitable outcome tends to lose on all four.

A closing word in our own voice: TortWise publishes plain-English explainers and is neither an insurer, a broker nor a law firm. What you have just read describes how premium decisions after an accident generally work, and that is the whole of what it does. It is not legal or insurance advice, it makes no prediction about what any insurer will do, and it deliberately declines to state surcharge amounts, surcharge durations or forgiveness terms, because those sit in filed rating plans and policy wordings that differ by carrier and by state. Every dollar figure and percentage above is a rounded illustration used to show the shape of a decision. Your own policy documents govern what you must report and when, your state department of insurance is the authority on what carriers may do where you live, and failing to report an accident can carry consequences well beyond a premium increase. Confirm anything uncertain with your insurer in writing, and consult a licensed attorney where liability is disputed or an injury is involved.

Edited by Hamza Hai, MBA · Editor

Hamza Hai is the editor of TortWise. She holds an MBA and reviews the site's articles against our editorial standards, checking that every figure is labelled for what it is, that nothing is presented as verified fact without a source the reader can check, and that the writing stays useful to a non-specialist.

How we research, write and review · LinkedIn